By Garlynn Woodsong | Contributing Writer
Hi folks, it’s Garlynn. After a few quiet years, I’m glad to be returning to this column. The need for us to talk about urbanism hasn’t been on pause, but life has been unfolding rapidly, sometimes uncomfortably, both inside and outside our front doors.
Since 2021, Portland has been through a lot. We’ve lived through extreme heat, wildfire smoke, ice storms, a lingering pandemic hangover, and a deepening housing crisis. Many civic systems feel tired, and many people feel worn down by processes that seem distant from daily life. Concordia has changed too. New neighbors have arrived, familiar faces have moved on, and the rhythms of the neighborhood have subtly shifted. And yet, some fundamentals remain remarkably steady. People still care deeply about their block, their street, their walk to the store, café, park, or school, and whether their neighborhood feels safe, welcoming, and alive.
That’s why neighborhood scale urbanism still matters. Cities aren’t only shaped by comprehensive plans and capital budgets, they’re shaped by what happens close to home. When we talk about housing, climate resilience, transportation, and public space at the neighborhood level, these issues become tangible rather than abstract. They show up as shade on a sidewalk, a place for a grandparent to live nearby, or whether kids can safely bike to a friend’s house.
Despite plenty of national and global uncertainty, there are reasons to feel cautiously hopeful about local action. Portland’s new City Council structure opens the door to more district based, locally grounded politics. Over time, this could create a clearer pathway for neighborhoods to have real authority, not just advisory roles.
One example of what that might look like is how we pay for and manage our streets. Imagine a system where residential parking permits and commercial parking meters generate revenue that is reinvested directly into neighborhood improvements. Half could support locally chosen projects through neighborhood associations, while the other half funds citywide street repair and transportation needs. There could even be a role for district level coordination, such as through Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods (NECN). With that level of responsibility, neighborhood boards would need stronger democratic legitimacy, potentially including elections administered through Multnomah County, clearer relationships to district offices, and tighter feedback loops with district based councilors.
This kind of evolution wouldn’t happen overnight. It would require care, transparency, and trust. But it points toward a future where neighborhoods aren’t just consulted, they’re empowered.
As I pick this column back up, my goal is simple- to keep asking how Concordia can remain a place of care, resilience, and shared responsibility in uncertain times. Urbanism, at its heart, is about how we choose to live together. That conversation belongs right here.
If you have ideas, questions, or stories you think are worth exploring, I hope you’ll share them. This column works best when it reflects the lived experience of the neighbors it serves.
The views expressed in this article are not affiliated with and do not necessarily represent the CNA board.
Garlynn Woodsong is a Concordia neighbor, planner, and dad who cares deeply about the city his son will inherit. His work centers on housing, climate action, and the everyday design of walkable, people focused communities. He welcomes ideas and questions from readers at garlynn42 @ gmail.com.

